Free Web Hosting Provider - Web Hosting - E-commerce - High Speed Internet - Free Web Page
Search the Web


In Our View - Wilson for Clerk
  Wilson for Clerk | Sherry's Parkers Illegal Signs | Photo Page | Guestbook Page | Sherry Parker's information | Facts behind the City of Vancouver Position on Ms. Parker's Signs | Hard Earned Union Dues at Work! | Clark County Conservative | Local Event Calendar | BREAKING NEWS ON UNION MONEY | Realblog  

VOTE FOR BAINE WILSON


Before you mark your ballot - please consider this important information.

The Clark County Clerk does administrative work to maintain and protect the court’s records. There are over 40 employees in the office. So the Clerk needs administrative and supervisory skills, and needs to have the background to budget and then manage the funds.

            This is not a position that makes policy, and probably should not be one where we elect either a Democrat or a Republican, but where we elect the best and most qualified person based on their accomplishments.

            Sherry Parker has no meaningful administrative or management experience.

She has worked in the Clerks office for fifteen years at the same level that she first worked in. She is a clerk in a court room. There has been no promotion on advancement to a supervisory position. Ms Parker has no budgetary experience. The closest that she has come to budgeting is that years ago she wrote checks as she was directed to do in Juvenile Court.

            The claim to be on a state budgetary commission is also bogus because Ms. Parker went to only one meeting before that went into her campaign brochures. A little more honesty would be better.

            She claims administrative experience as a result of being on the Clark College Board of Trustees. Anyone who serves on a board knows the Boards make policy, and are not administrators. And even without administrative responsibilities, Ms. Parker has not been effective. She ignored faculty and staff until the college had paid large amounts of money to terminate the president. This was a missed opportunity to show leadership, if one were able to do so.

            One may wonder where there has not been more attention to prior public services – and that is because there is little in the way of contributing to the community, although she has lived here long enough to have made significant contributions if there was both the ability and the commitment to service. What community groups have endorsed Sherry Parker – none. Her service is focused on this campaign.

            A look at the web site will also result in questions by citizens. There are very few supporters listed, and those supporters are from one political party. There are very few financial contributions listed with the Public Disclosure Commissions – except for a large donation from the electricians union, whose interest in the Clerk’s office would be interesting to know. When the easily recognizable names of family members are removed from the list of supporters and financial contributions, there is very little left, except for the union money.

            Sherry Parker has no educational background to help her be a court clerk.

Ms. Parker who wants to work with the court’s records and says she can manage legal matters should have that her signs were in violation of state law. How will she have the integrity to work with legal documents if she refuses to follow the law on something as clear as legal signs, when the information was provided to her when she filed for office? What laws will she chose not to follow if they are inconvenient for her?

            A clear contrast is made between Baine Wilson and Sherry Parker. Baine is running on her skills, qualifications, and vision – not on the names of her political friends. Ms. Wilson is currently the administrator in her department, and does the budgeting and manages both her staff and the money allocated to her by the county commissioners. Baine has earned her position of responsibility through hard work and has been promoted for her hard work. 

            Ms. Wilson Public Disclosure Reports show that she has broad support in the community, and supports that is based on individuals of many backgrounds.

            Baine Wilson has made people responsible for their criminal actions that cost us money as tax payers. She has been very successful in collecting fines and judgments to make county government and the courts more efficient. Thousands of citizens who are victims got money owed them because of a crime. Ms. Wilson shows her integrity by making claims that are supported by the facts. She lists skills and accomplishments that are long term. Her pride in her family is shown in her campaign advertisements. She has complied with the law. She is much a part of the community, and has provided service to the community with a goal greater than one campaign. Her education in society and justice is another qualification.

            Ms. Wilson also has great ideas about how to improve the clerk’s office. She has been specific about her ideas from the beginning of this campaign, and they are ideas that will improve service to the public and allow the office to work more efficiently. Her vision of utilizing technology to make the office easier for professionals and the public to use show that she has spent much time looking for ways to move the office ahead and make it a place where the public is served as opposed to being served by the public. We need someone in the office who can see what needs to be done, and has the ability to get it done. The only clerk in the office who has made her support known to the public supports Baine Wilson – and this is someone who can speak with first hand knowledge of both candidates.

            Based on candidates, it is clear that well informed voters who do no make decisions based on the special interests of  a few or strict partisan politics will vote for Baine Wilson. I ask you to make this county better and vote for Baine Wilson.

Clark County Clerk

Baine Wilson
P O BOX 587
La Center, WA 98629
Phone: (360) 901-9866

wilsonmicheletti@aol.com



Baine Wilson's Video Link

Clark County Demorcrats for the truth!

COUNTER ADDED 10/21/06
INFORMATION ABOUT "Public record" defined
WAC 44-14-03001 "Public record" defined.Courts use a three-part test to determine if a record is a "public record." The document must be: A "writing," containing information "relating to the conduct of government" or the performance of any governmental or proprietary function, "prepared, owned, used, or retained" by an agency.1

(1) Writing. A "public record" can be any writing "regardless of physical form or characteristics." RCW 42.17.020(41). "Writing" is defined very broadly as: "...handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photographing, and every other means of recording any form of communication or representation, including, but not limited to, letters, words, pictures, sounds, or symbols, or combination thereof, and all papers, maps, magnetic or paper tapes, photographic films and prints, motion picture, film and video recordings, magnetic or punched cards, discs, drums, diskettes, sound recordings, and other documents including existing data compilations from which information may be obtained or translated." RCW 42.17.020(48). An e-mail is a "writing."

(2) Relating to the conduct of government. To be a "public record," a document must relate to the "conduct of government or the performance of any governmental or proprietary function." RCW 42.17.020(41). Almost all records held by an agency relate to the conduct of government; however, some do not. A purely personal record having absolutely no relation to the conduct of government is not a "public record." Even though a purely personal record might not be a "public record," a record of its existence might be. For example, a record showing the existence of a purely personal e-mail sent by an agency employee on an agency computer would probably be a "public record," even if the contents of the e-mail itself were not.2

(3) "Prepared, owned, used, or retained." A "public record" is a record "prepared, owned, used, or retained" by an agency. RCW 42.17.020(41).

A record can be "used" by an agency even if the agency does not actually possess the record. If an agency uses a record in its decision-making process it is a "public record."3 For example, if an agency considered technical specifications of a public works project and returned the specifications to the contractor in another state, the specifications would be a "public record" because the agency "used" the document in its decision-making process.4 The agency could be required to obtain the public record, unless doing so would be impossible. An agency cannot send its only copy of a record to a third party for the sole purpose of avoiding disclosure.5

Sometimes agency employees work on agency business from home computers. These home computer records (including e-mail) were "used" by the agency and relate to the "conduct of government" so they are "public records." RCW 42.17.020(41). However, the act does not authorize unbridled searches of agency property.6 If agency property is not subject to unbridled searches, then neither is the home computer of an agency employee. Yet, because the home computer documents relating to agency business are "public records," they are subject to disclosure (unless exempt). Agencies should instruct employees that all public records, regardless of where they were created, should eventually be stored on agency computers. Agencies should ask employees to keep agency-related documents on home computers in separate folders and to routinely blind carbon copy ("bcc") work e-mails back to the employee's agency e-mail account. If the agency receives a request for records that are solely on employees' home computers, the agency should direct the employee to forward any responsive documents back to the agency, and the agency should process the request as it would if the records were on the agency's computers.

Notes:1Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation v. Johnson, 135 Wn.2d 734, 748, 958 P.2d 260 (1998). For records held by the secretary of the senate or chief clerk of the house of representatives, a "public record" is a "legislative record" as defined in RCW 40.14.100. RCW 42.17.020(41).
2Tiberino v. Spokane County Prosecutor, 103 Wn. App. 680, 691, 13 P.3d 1104 (2000).
3Concerned Ratepayers v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1, 138 Wn.2d 950, 958-61, 983 P.2d 635 (1999).
4Id.
5See Op. Att'y Gen. 11 (1989), at 4, n.2 ("We do not wish to encourage agencies to avoid the provisions of the public disclosure act by transferring public records to private parties. If a record otherwise meeting the statutory definition were transferred into private hands solely to prevent its public disclosure, we expect courts would take appropriate steps to require the agency to make disclosure or to sanction the responsible public officers.")
6See Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wn.2d 439, 448, 90 P.3d 26 (2004).




[Statutory Authority: 2005 c 483 § 4, RCW 42.17.348. 06-04-079, § 44-14-03001, filed 1/31/06, effective 3/3/06.]

The laws are in place on the State level. Baine Wilson has made people responsible for their criminal actions that cost us money as tax payers. She has been very successful in collecting fines and judgments to make county government and the courts more efficient.

36.23.100
Electronic payment of court fees and other financial obligations — Authorized.

County clerks are authorized to accept credit cards, charge cards, debit cards, smart cards, stored value cards, federal wire, and automatic clearinghouse system transactions, or other electronic communication, for payment of all fees and moneys due the court under RCW 36.18.012 through 36.18.020, and for the payment of court-ordered legal financial obligations of criminal defendants which include, but are not limited to, fines, fees, assessments, restitution, and crime victims' compensation, consistent with RCW 36.48.010, 36.48.080, and 36.48.090. A payer desiring to pay by credit card, charge card, debit card, smart card, stored value card, federal wire, and automatic clearinghouse system transactions, or other electronic communication shall bear the cost of processing the transaction.

[2000 c 202 § 1.]

[2000 c 202 § 1.]